1 of 6
Supreme Court of Florida
Oral Argument Press Summaries
June 4-8, 2012
The following summaries are drawn from briefs and lower court judgments. They are meant to provide a general idea of facts and issues presented in cases, and should not be considered official court documents. Facts and issues presented in these summaries should be checked for accuracy against records and briefs, available from the Court, which provide more specific information.
Via Satellite: Information available at http://www.wfsu.org/tv/services.php#satellite
Satellite broadcasts are subject to change. Check with Rick Potrikus at FSU for last minute changes (800) 322-WFSU.
Watch us on the Web in RealVideo at http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/ If you miss a live case, view it from our archive: http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/archives.htm
Names & phone numbers of attorneys in cases: http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/summaries/attorneys.pdf
Robert Craig Waters, Director of Public Information
(850) 414-7641
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Monday, June 4, 2012
Arrive early. Times & order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice. Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case |
Time |
Facts & Issues |
Place of Origin |
No cases scheduled |
|
|
|
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Arrive early. Times & order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice. Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case |
Time |
Facts & Issues |
Place of Origin |
Joan Ruble v. Rinker Materials Corp. View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
9:00 |
Joan Ruble and her husband filed a personal injury lawsuit against Rinker Materials, alleging his terminal mesothelioma was caused by exposure to asbestos in Rinker products. After he died, she moved to continue the lawsuit as a personal representative of his estate. The trial court, however, dismissed the case, ruling Florida's Wrongful Death Act required that a new suit be filed. The Third District Court of Appeal upheld that decision. |
Miami-Dade County |
Karen Capone v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
Approx. 9:40 |
Mrs. Capone and her husband filed a personal injury lawsuit against Philip Morris, alleging his injuries and her loss of consortium were caused by his smoking. After he died, she moved to continue the lawsuit, both on her own behalf and as a personal representative of his estate. Philip Morris argued, among other things, that Florida's Wrongful Death Act required that a new suit be filed. The trial court ruled the case had to be dismissed and the Third District Court of Appeal upheld that decision. |
Miami-Dade County |
George Jackson v. The Shakespeare Foundation View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
Approx. 10:30 |
The Shakespeare Foundation and its developer accused George Jackson, Kerry Jackson and their real estate company of fraud in a lawsuit filed over a property deal. The suit alleged the Jacksons had misrepresented the presence of wetlands on the property. The Jacksons argued the suit should be dismissed because of an arbitration provision in the sales contract. The trial court agreed but the First District Court of Appeal reversed that ruling. The 1st DCA also ruled that its opinion was in conflict with an opinion issued by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in a similar case. |
Bay County |
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Arrive early. Times & order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice. Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case |
Time |
Facts & Issues |
Place of Origin |
In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Cout View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
9:00 |
The Florida Bar's Traffic Court Rules Committee has proposed changes to the rules governing traffic court. One change would add a provision designed to make sure people representing themselves are aware of their constitutional right against self-incrimination. Another proposed change would require that drivers who want a hearing after their licenses have been suspended have six months to request it. |
Statewide impact |
In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
Approx. 9:30 |
The Florida Bar's Juvenile Court Rules Committee has proposed rule changes. Some changes would make juvenile delinquency rules more like rules in adult criminal cases. For example, juveniles would have to be given enough time to consider pleas and be told of possible consequences of pleas, such as registration as a sexual offender or immigration status. Other rule changes would affect dependency and termination of parental rights cases. Some of these changes would let courts review the state's search for a missing parent and would add to the procedures for determining paternity. |
Statewide impact |
Vincent J. Puglisi v. State of Florida View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
Approx. 10:00 |
Mr. Puglisi was convicted of the first-degree murder of Alan Jay Shalleck, who was fatally stabbed and beaten in 2006. Mr. Puglisi was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, arguing the trial court erred when it allowed his defense attorneys to refuse to call witnesses whom he wanted to testify. The 4th DCA upheld the trial court. Mr. Puglisi argued that ruling conflicted with decisions by other Florida appellate courts. |
Palm Beach County |
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Arrive early. Times & order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice. Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case |
Time |
Facts & Issues |
Place of Origin |
Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit v. State of Florida View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
9:00 |
The Public Defender advised the trial court that its caseload had become so excessive that it could no longer take new non-capital felony cases. The trial court issued an order allowing the office to refuse some new cases. The Third District Court of Appeal overturned that ruling. In a second similar case, the trial court issued an order approving a request for an individual public defender to withdraw from a case. The 3rd DCA overturned that ruling as well. |
Miami-Dade County |
In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number(s) here |
Approx. 9:40 |
The Florida Bar's Rules of Criminal Procedure Committee has proposed changes to the rules governing criminal procedures. Examples include clarifying the time frame for filing a notice of expiration of speedy trial deadline and clarifying the right of a pro se defendant or an attorney to apply for subpoenas. Another proposed rule change would allow a judge to write an answer to a jury's questions rather than bringing the jury back into the courtroom to respond orally. |
Statewide impact |
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Friday, June 8, 2012
Arrive early. Times & order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice. Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case |
Time |
Facts & Issues |
Place of Origin |
No cases scheduled |
|
|
|