Florida Supreme Court Oral Argument Press Summaries
Oral Argument Press Summaries
April 5-9, & 21, 2004
The following summaries are drawn from briefs and lower court judgments.They are meant to provide a general idea of facts and issues presentedin cases, and should not be considered official court documents. Factsand issues presented in these summaries should be checked for accuracyagainst records and briefs, available from the Court, which provide morespecific information.
Via Satellite: Telstar 4, KU Band, 89degrees west, transponder 13 lower, virtual channel 804,
downlink frequency 12081.750 MHz, L-band frequency 1331.750 MHz
The satellite may be preempted duringlegislative sessions and emergencies.
Check with Suzanne Smith
at WFSUfor last minute changes (800) 322-WFSU Ext. 335.
Some local cable systems in Floridausually carry our broadcasts live or tape-delayed.
See the partiallist of these systems.
Watch us on the Web in RealVideo at http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/If you miss a live case, view it from our archive at http://www.wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/archives.html
Names &phone numbers of attorneys
in these cases are available in Acrobatformat.
RobertCraig Waters, Director of Public Information
(850) 414-7641
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
John J. Ryan, IV v. LeonorLobo deGonzalez SC03-933 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | 9:00 | At issue in this case isa dispute over the possession of shares of the Chiriqui Sugar Mills Corporation.The trial court held that the suit over the shares was untimely and thatequitable estoppel did not revive the Ryans' claims because they did nothave knowledge of the underlying claim during the statute of limitationsperiod. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that a partymust have knowledge of a cause of action during the limitations periodin order to effectively assert equitable estoppel against a statute oflimitations bar. The Ryans seek review on the grounds of express and directconflict with a Florida Supreme Court case. | Indian River County |
John Steven Huggins v.State of Florida SC02-2364 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 9:40 | Huggins was convictedofthe first-degree murder of Carla Larson, committed in Orlando on June10,1997, as well as kidnaping, carjacking, and petit theft. The juryrecommended and the court imposed the sentence of death. This isHuggin'sdirect appeal. | Orange County |
Albert Goble v. MarkE. Frohman SC03-1245 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 10:40 | Section 768.76, FloridaStatutes, instructs courts to reduce compensatory damages awards by theamounts available to plaintiffs from statutorily-defined collateral sources.The certified question before the Court is whether discounts off medicalbills, given by medical providers as required under an HMO contract, constitute"collateral sources" to reduce an award of damages under section 768.76. | Hillsborough County |
Florida Municipal InsuranceTrust v. Village of Golf SC03-1598 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 11:20 | The insured, the municipalityof the Village of Golf, settled a claim with a farmer based upon allegeddamages to a crop from a chlorine leak at a City facility. The City thenbrought this suit against its insurer, Florida Municipal Insurance Trust,claiming that it was prejudiced by the insurer's inadequate pre-suit investigation,which should estop the insurer from denying coverage. The trial court agreedand awarded damages to the insured based upon estoppel, which was affirmedby the Fourth District. This Court granted jurisdiction to review the FourthDistrict's certified question of great public importance. | Palm Beach County |
Florida Supreme Court OralArguments
Tuesday, April 6, 2004
Arrive early. Times &order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice.Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
Ronna Martino v. Wal-MartStores, Inc. SC03-334| SC03-956 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | 9:00 | These combined cases posethe question of the whether people can sue someone, who allegedly has negligentlyinjured, them for failing to preserve evidence that might prove the negligence. | Palm Beach County Polk County |
Kenneth Louis Dessaurev. State of Florida SC02-286 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 9:40 | Dessaure was tried, convicted,and sentenced to death for the February 1999 first-degree murder of CindyRiedweg. This is his direct appeal. | Pinellas County |
Darryl Walker v. Stateof Florida SC03-1555 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 10:40 | Darryl Walker was sentencedto 5 years in prison for a burglary. The First District Court of Appealcertified the following question to this Court: Is the Florida standardjury instruction on "possession of property recently stolen" an impermissiblecomment on the evidence? | Duval County |
Indemnity Insurance Co.v. American Aviation, Inc. SC03-1601 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 11:20 | Indemnity Insurance andProfile Aviation Services, Inc. filed suit against American Aviation allegingthat the latter negligently serviced and repaired an aircraft purchasedby Profile. The United States District Court for the Middle District ofFlorida dismissed Indemnity's claims, finding them barred by Florida law.Indemnity appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which certifiedto this Court five questions concerning the application of Florida lawto the facts of the case. | Central Florida |
Florida Supreme Court OralArguments
Wednesday, April 7, 2004
Arrive early. Times &order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice.Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
Roderick Michael Ormev. State of Florida SC02-2625| SC03-1375 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | 9:00 | Orme was convicted of firstdegree murder and sentenced to death in 1993. His conviction and sentencewere upheld on direct appeal. In these proceedings, he challenges the validityof both the conviction and sentence. | Bay County |
State of Florida v. JamesChristopher White SC02-2277| SC03-166 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 9:40 | These consolidated casesdisagree on the issue of whether, in a civil commitment proceeding pursuantto the Jimmy Ryce Act, the jury must be instructed that the respondenthas "serious difficulty in controlling behavior." The First District heldthat the jury must be given the instruction, while the Fourth Districtheld to the contrary. | Bay County Hillsborough County |
Paul Glen Everett v.State of Florida SC03-73 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 10:30 | Appellant was convictedof first-degree murder, burglary of a dwelling with a battery, and sexualbattery involving serious physical force, which occurred on November 2,2001. The jury unanimously recommended and the court imposed the sentenceof death. This is Everett's direct appeal. | Bay County |
James A. Zingale v. RobertO. Powell SC03-1270 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 11:30 | In 1992, voters adopteda constitutional amendment known as "Save Our Homes" that limits increasesin tax assessments on homestead property. The amendment went into effectin 1994. The Powells, who have owned and lived in their home in BrowardCounty since 1990, first applied for and obtained a homestead exemptionin 2001. The Fourth District held that despite the Powells' failure toseek a homestead exemption before tax year 2001, they were entitled tothe "Save Our Homes" cap's limit on an increase in the assessment for taxyear 2000. That decision is being challenged by the state Department ofRevenue and numerous county property appraisers. | Broward County Statewide impact |
Florida Supreme Court OralArguments
Thursday, April 8, 2004
Arrive early. Times &order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice.Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
Anthony Floyd Wainwrightv. State of Florida SC02-1342| SC02-2021 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | 9:00 | Wainwright was tried, convicted,and sentenced to death for the April 1994 murder of Carmen Gayheart afterabducting her in a Lake City grocery store parking lot. His sentence wasaffirmed on appeal. He now challenges its validity. | Hamilton County Lake City connection |
Daniel Jon Peterka v.State of Florida SC02-1410| SC03-482 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 9:40 | Daniel Peterka was convictedof the 1989 murder of John Russell. He was sentenced to death, and hisconviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. Peterka now challengesthe validity of both his conviction and sentence. | Okaloosa County |
Errol Austin Rollmanv. State of Florida SC03-1871 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | Approx. 10:30 | Errol Austin Rollman wassentenced to ten years of imprisonment and ten years of probation, andwas required to pay restitution for his role in an armed robbery. Priorto sentencing, Rollman engaged in plea bargaining with the trial judge,who stated that Rollman's sentence would be capped at ten years of imprisonment.The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the sentence, but certifiedas a question of great public importance to this Court, whether a judgemay engage in plea bargaining, state the maximum sentence on the record,and later render a more severe sentence, without any apparent justificationfrom the record. | Okaloosa County |
Florida Supreme Court OralArguments
Friday, April 9, 2004
Arrive early. Times &order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice.Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
Court Holiday |
Florida Supreme Court OralArguments
Wednesday April 21, 2004
Arrive early. Times &order of appearance are tentative and subject to change with no notice.Cases may be postponed due to exigent circumstances.
Case | Time | Facts & Issues | Place of Origin |
Nathaniel Charles Jonesv. State of Florida SC03-1363 View briefs in Acrobatformat by clicking the case number(s) here | 9:00 a.m. | Jones sought this Court'sreview of a district court decision overturning the trial court's decisionto exclude from trial a police officer's identification of Jones from avideo taped lineup. This case asks the Florida Supreme Court to decidewhether the right to counsel guaranteed by Florida's Constitution requiresa defendant's attorney to be present when the prosecution shows a videotaped lineup to a witness for identification purposes. | Miami-Dade County |
Check the Florida Supreme CourtHome Pages on the Internet for Latest Information & LiveAudio/Video of Arguments and Satellite Transmission Information
Media Inquires
(850) 414-7641 | EMAIL
Court Schedule
Address:
Florida Supreme Court
500 South Duval Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399




